Invitation to Contribute
Dear Colleagues,
We invite you to contribute original work to Writing With AI, a new project hosted by Writing Commons, the open-access encyclopedia for writers. This initiative builds on our long-standing mission to make peer-reviewed, evidence-based resources freely available to, students, teachers, and knowledge workers worldwide.
We aim to publish short, research-informed pieces—typically 800 to 1,200 words—that share practical guidance and critical insight on composing in the age of generative AI. We seek contributions that help our global community of writers navigate this moment with integrity, creativity, and agency. We welcome work that advances critical AI literacy in all its forms—by promoting responsible adoption, offering principled skepticism, or articulating informed resistance. While we anticipate most contributions will come from faculty, graduate students, and researchers, we also welcome submissions developed in undergraduate courses or coauthored by students and instructors—especially those that model effective GenAI pedagogy or collaborative inquiry.
We will publish articles, multimodal compositions, presentations, podcasts, and other resources that serve students, teachers, and knowledge workers. We invite you to pitch a piece—drawing on your expertise as a researcher, your experience as a teacher, or your perspective as a student—that helps writers and writing teachers explore how to compose ethically and effectively with AI.
The guiding question we ask you to consider is:
How can writers write with AI in ethical ways that uphold academic integrity, preserve authorial agency, expedite composing processes, adopt a style appropriate to specific rhetorical situations, and strengthen our capacity to reason critically and communicate effectively in writing?
Who Are We? What Are Our Goals?
We are professors in the field of writing studies and advocates for open education. We believe that access to knowledge should be free, global, and inclusive. Since 2008, Writing Commons has published open-access, peer-reviewed resources that help students, teachers, and knowledge workers write with greater fluency, creativity, and integrity. For seventeen years, our mission has been to democratize knowledge—to make the study of writing, rhetoric, and digital communication freely available beyond the gated paywalls of traditional publishers and learning management systems. Over the years, we have peer-reviewed and published contributions from hundreds of faculty, graduate students, and even a few undergraduates across the globe. We now offer approximately 1,000 articles on topics of interest to writers, writing teachers, and professional writers.
In recognition of this work, Writing Commons has received the John Lovas Award from Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy. The first iteration of the project, College Writing Online, received the Distinguished Book Award from Computers and Composition.
As scholars of writing technologies, we recognize that every medium of expression reshapes consciousness itself. Ong showed that writing exteriorizes thought, transforming fleeting speech into a visual, durable technology that restructures consciousness, memory, reasoning, and social organization. Bolter extended this argument, showing how each new medium “remediates” the old—redefining what counts as literacy, authorship, and even knowledge. The rise of generative AI marks another such turning point. Like the shift from orality to literacy, or from print to digital hypertext, AI alters not only how we compose but how we conceive of composing. For many in Writing Studies, this change is both unsettling and inevitable. It challenges long-held beliefs about authorship, creativity, and the value of struggle in learning to write. Yet transformation also creates an opening. Writing Studies—rooted in the study of cognition, composing, and creativity—is uniquely positioned to help students and professionals navigate this change critically. Our task is not to celebrate or condemn AI, but to examine how writing with AI might deepen, rather than diminish, human judgment, agency, and imagination.
Why Publish With Us?
Publishing in Writing Commons connects your work to a global community of students, teachers, and professionals. Since our founding in 2008, more than 15 million readers have used the site to learn about writing, rhetoric, and communication. Contributors describe Writing Commons as a space where scholarship, teaching, and public engagement meet—an opportunity to make research accessible beyond paywalls and learning management systems. Authors benefit from peer review, editorial feedback, and wide visibility—many pieces reach thousands of readers and are frequently cited in classrooms and open-education projects. Faculty and graduate contributors have included their publications in tenure and promotion portfolios, while others use their work on Writing Commons to demonstrate innovation in digital scholarship and pedagogy.
Tentative Table of Contents
The draft table of contents below signals the range of work we hope to publish—not a limit.
AI Theory
This section grounds practice in first principles: what writing is, why human authorship matters, and how technologies—from cuneiform tablets to LLMs—reshape thought, culture, and power. We’re especially interested in perspectives that help students, faculty, and knowledge workers see what’s gained—and what’s lost—when machine-authored prose begins to replace human-authored prose.
Possible contributions might address questions such as:
- What is Writing?
- What is the Value of Human Writing?
- What is Generative AI?
- What is Critical AI Literacy?
- What is Authorship?
- Why Writing Studies Should Resist GenAI
- Why Writing Studies Should Lead—Not Resist—the GenAI Revolution by Joseph M. Moxley
- Why Should Students Resist GenAI? by Sean Moxley-Kelly, ASU
- Why Should Students Embrace GenAI?
- How Do Algorithms Shape What You See and What You Get?
- How Do Human Assumptions Create Bias in AI?
- Does AI Encourage Creativity or Conformity? by Quentin Vieregge, UWEC-BC
- When Do AI Outputs Reinforce Inequity?
- What Is the Future of Writing, Literacy, and Learning? by Djuddah Arthur Joost Leigen, University of Tartu
- If AI Achieves Superintelligence, Will Humans Still Write?
Authorship, Ownership, and Academic Integrity
Generative AI unsettles long-standing ideas of originality, authorship, and intellectual property. We seek contributions that illuminate the tensions between resistance and adoption, faculty and student perspectives, and academic and workplace practices. Pieces should help readers navigate authorship, copyright, fair use, and integrity in an age when human and machine collaboration is routine.
Possible contributions might address questions such as:
- What Is Authorship in the Age of AI?
- Can GenAI Be Used Without Undermining Copyright and Academic Integrity?
- Who Owns AI-Generated Work? by Kristin Terrill, ISU
- How Should Universities Set Clear Guidelines for AI Use?
Critical AI Literacy
Using AI responsibly requires more than clever prompts. This section, informed by the MLA–CCCC Task Force on Writing and AI, calls for contributions that teach students, faculty, and knowledge workers to recognize ethical challenges, safeguard privacy, and practice transparency. We are especially interested in pieces that help readers understand when GenAI use is appropriate and when it risks plagiarism, misinformation, or ethical lapses in school and workplace settings.
Possible contributions might address questions such as:
- How to Recognize the Ethical Challenges of Generative AI
- How to Protect Your Privacy When Using AI
- How AI Shapes What You See and What You Get
- How to Use AI Responsibly in Your Writing
- How to Be Transparent About Your AI Use
- Help! What Do I Do When Someone Accuses Me of Using AI? by Roberto Leon, GCSU
- Is AI Fluency a Basic Literacy by Joseph Feller, University College Cork, and Rick Dakan, Ringling College of Art and Design
- When and How to Cite Generative AI in Your Writing by Joseph M. Moxley, USF
What Research Tells Us About AI and Writing
AI is not only a tool but also an urgent object of study. This section invites contributions from scholars who are mapping the impact of AI on composing, creativity, learning, agency, and reasoning. Articles should synthesize emerging findings for students, teachers, and knowledge workers seeking to understand how AI is reshaping literacy. Reviews of literature are welcome.
Possible contributions might address questions such as:
- How Does AI Alter Students’ Writing Processes?
- What Is the Effect of AI on Creativity?
- Does AI Diminish or Support Human Agency?
- How Does AI Affect Learning?
- What Is the Impact of AI on Reasoning?
Social, Political, and Cultural Impacts
Writing with AI does not occur in a vacuum. It is tied to larger systems of labor, politics, environment, and human development. Contributions here should help readers grapple with the global stakes of generative AI, including equity, sustainability, and survival.
Possible contributions might address questions such as:
- What Are the Environmental Costs of GenAI?
- How Does GenAI Affect Human Agency and Cognitive Development?
- How Does GenAI Influence Political Discourse?
- How Does GenAI Transform Human Labor?
- Does GenAI Threaten Humanity Itself?
- How Will GenAI Affect Writing Studies?
Critical Thinking and AI
AI cannot think for us, but it can simulate dialogue, generate counterarguments, and mirror reasoning. This section seeks contributions that show how AI can be used to sharpen—not replace—human judgment across fields of study and work.
Possible contributions might address questions such as:
- How to Train AI to Challenge Your Thinking by Lynn Koller, ERAU
- How To Dialog With AI and Your Inner Voice to Advance Your Thinking
- How to Use AI to Analyze Citations and Scholarly Conversations
- How to Use AI to Assess or Develop Credibility and Authority
- How to Use AI to Assess Evidence and Citations
- How to Use AI to Assess Research Interpretations and Conclusions
- How to Use AI to Assess Research Methods and Methodologies
- How to Use AI to Avoid Confirmation Bias
- How to Use AI to Detect AI-Generated Content
- How to Use AI to Identify Misinformation
Learning and AI
Many students, faculty, and knowledge workers are experimenting with AI as a study partner or teaching assistant. In practice, GenAI is already playing roles as a Thought Partner (for brainstorming and counterarguments), Research Assistant (for finding and summarizing sources), Composing Assistant (for drafting and revising), Citation Assistant (for formatting references), Editorial Assistant (for flow and clarity), Designer (for visuals), Publishing Assistant (for adapting work), and Teaching Assistant (for modeling skills). Contributions should show how to integrate these roles into learning while maintaining human agency and intellectual growth.
Possible contributions might address questions such as:
- How to Use AI as Thought Partner or Teaching Assistant
- How to Use AI for Paraphrase and Summarization
- How to Use AI for Personalized Learning
- How to Experiment with Chatbots to Develop Your Writing Style?
- How Can You Work with AI Tool to Better Manage Your Writing Processes?
Style and AI
Style is central to communication. This section explores how AI can help (or hinder) writers working toward clarity, brevity, coherence, inclusivity, and flow. Contributions should show how AI can be prompted to respect disciplinary and professional conventions, while avoiding vagueness, jargon, or homogenized “AI voice.”
Possible contributions might address questions such as:
- How to Use AI to Achieve Brevity
- How to Use AI to Enhance Clarity
- How to Use AI to Simplify Complex Ideas
- How to Use AI to Enhance Coherence in Your Writing
- How to Use AI to Improve Diction
- How to Use AI to Help Structure Information
- How to Use AI to Promote Inclusivity
- How to Use AI to Foster Unity
Writing Processes and AI
Writing is recursive: prewriting, inventing, drafting, collaborating, researching, planning, organizing, designing, rereading, revising, editing, proofreading, sharing or publishing all feed into each other. Today, AI can play a role at every stage. We invite contributions that help readers learn how to integrate AI responsibly into their processes—while keeping human judgment and voice at the center.
Possible contributions might address questions such as:
The Dialogic Process
- How to Engage in Iterative AI Conversations Across Writing Processes
- How to Balance AI Dialogue with Your Inner Voice and Felt Sense
- How to Engage in Iterative AI Conversations Across Writing Processes by Lynn Koller, ERAU
Rhetorical Reasoning and AI
- How to Use AI to Adopt an Appropriate Rhetorical Stance by Cassandra Branham, ERAU)
- How to Use AI to Strategize Rhetorical Moves
- How to Use AI to Develop Credibility and Authority
- How to Use AI to Develop Effective Rhetorical Appeals
- How to Use AI to Understand Your Rhetorical Situation
Prewriting, Invention, and Creativity with AI
Invention works best when you start with your own sparks, then widen the field. These chapters help you prompt for range and novelty without letting the model set your agenda.
- How to Be in Creative Flow When Composing with AI
- How to Use AI to Improve Writing Planning Without Losing Ownership
- How College Students are Reimagining AI’s Role in Education by Abram Anders, ISU
Planning and Organizing with AI
- How to Use AI to Analyze Genre and Audience Expectations
- How To Use AI to Improve Writing Planning
- How to Use AI to Analyze Genre
- How to Use AI to Help Structure Information
Researching with AI
- How to Use AI to Expedite and Improve Research Processes
- How to Use AI as a Research Assistant?
- How to Use AI as a Research Tool
Designing with AI
- How to Use AI to Improve Document Design
- How to Use AI to Generate Multimodal Compositions
Revising and Editing with AI
Great writing is designed, then refined. Use AI to prototype layouts, run structured revision passes, and polish sentences—while preserving tone, ethics, and authorship.
- How to Train AI to Engage in Structured Revision
- How to Use AI to Improve Document Design
- How to Train AI To Edit Documents
- How to Conduct a Self Review with AI by Alaina Tackitt, New College
AI Tools
- Major Platforms (Commercial & Open Source)
- Types of AI Tools
- AI Design Tools
- AI Coaching Tools
- Text to Audio AI Tools
- Text to Image AI Tools
- Text to Video AI Tools
How to Contribute
Style and Format Guidelines
We welcome a variety of formats, including written articles, podcasts, videos, or other multimodal compositions, as long as they address topics within our scope.
Accessibility and Clarity
Whether you are submitting a written article, a podcast script, or a video presentation, express ideas in direct, comprehensible language. Define specialized terms as needed and maintain a style that is inclusive and understandable for a wide range of readers and viewers.
Citations and Attribution
Cite any sources you reference using the guidelines provided in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). Include in-text citations and a corresponding reference list at the end of your piece. Ensure that all borrowed ideas, information, or media are properly attributed. Hyperlink to referenced articles when they are freely available on the internet.
Tone and Voice
Present your content in an engaging manner. Use a voice that reflects intellectual rigor while remaining approachable, conveying complex concepts without unnecessary jargon. We aim to present insights that are concise, visual, and meaningful to both students and knowledge workers.
Practical and Theoretical Balance
We welcome both practical, hands-on advice and thoughtful, theoretical explorations of writing, literacy, and communication. Consider balancing these approaches so that your piece offers insights that readers and viewers can both understand and apply.
Submission Guidelines
Your submission
- should be saved as a .doc or .docx file; submit images as .jpeg or .png and video as links or .mp4
- should use the file name “Title of Article”
- should include a brief cover letter that introduces your article and title and notes any concerns or questions
- may include images or videos; provide captions, transcripts, alt text, and permissions as needed
- may include hyperlinks to student-friendly resources
If you are submitting podcasts, videos, or a multi-page hyperlinked text, e-mail Dr. Roberto Leon (roberto.leon@gcsu.edu) for specific directions.
Peer Review
Once we receive your article and confirm it matches our needs, we will begin the peer-review process. Articles will be reviewed by at least two members of the staff, review editors, or editorial board. You will then receive our decision to publish as is, publish with revisions, or reject.
We try to have a quick turnaround time with our peer-review process. From initial submission to notification of the submission status, please allow approximately four weeks.
Copyright and Publishing Agreement
As the author, you have four choices to copyright your work:
- © Your Last Name
- Licensed Under CC BY 2.0
- Licensed Under CC BY-SA 4.0
- Licensed Under CC BY-SA 4.0
How to Submit
Send your pitch or completed piece to Dr. Roberto Leon (roberto.leon@gcsu.edu)


