Protected: Metacognitive Report – AI Writing Ethics: Balancing Agency, Voice & Disclosure
When used critically and rhetorically, GenAI-assisted writing can help you develop more authoritative, well-researched, and audience-focused discourse. Strategic AI use can help you expedite research processes, test counterarguments, refine your voice, and adapt content for different rhetorical situations. However, if you use GenAI as a passive consumer rather than as a critical thinker, it can diminish your development as a thinker and knowledge worker.
Research shows that uncritical AI use leads to cognitive offloading, reduced critical thinking, and diminished authorship (Ward et al., 2024; Lee et al., 2025; Kosmyna et al., 2025). From the learning sciences, we know about the "law of less work," first formalized by Hull (1943), who showed that when people have a choice, they tend to select the path that requires less cognitive effort. Recent meta-analytic work by David, Vassena, and Bijleveld (2024) confirms this consistent link between mental effort and negative affect, demonstrating that people often avoid sustained thinking when easier options are available. Because thinking is often effortful and even unpleasant, it's tempting to outsource itโbut that's exactly why it's worth practicing.
This Metacognitive Report assignment mitigates these risks by asking you to (1) assign specific roles to AI (Thought Partner, Editorial Assistant, Teaching Assistant, etc.), (2) maintain human judgment over what to accept and reject, (3) use AI as a Teaching Assistant to deepen your understanding of the topic and advance your development as a writer and critical thinker, and (4) identify your "Moment of Difference"โthe specific point where your judgment diverged from AI's output and you took back creative control. You document this process through critical reflection that demonstrates your agency and transparency using disclosure practices appropriate for both academic and workplace contexts (MLA-CCCC Joint Task Force, 2024).
References
Anderson, J., & Rainie, L. (2023, February 24). The future of human agency. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2023/02/24/the-future-of-human-agency/
Aschenbrenner, L. (2024, June). Situational awareness: The decade ahead. Situational Awareness AI. https://situational-awareness.ai/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/situationalawareness.pdf
Barrett, A., & Pack, A. (2023). Not quite eye to A.I.: Student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 59.
Baron, D. (2009). A better pencil: Readers, writers, and the digital revolution. Oxford University Press.
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610โ623). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Biermann, O. C. (2022). Writers want AI collaborators to respect their personal values and writing strategies: A human-centered perspective on AI co-writing [Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia].
Boice, R. (2000). Advice for new faculty members: Nihil nimus. Pearson.
Bolter, J. D. (2001). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.
Coffey, L. (2023, October 31). Students outrunning faculty in AI use. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/tech-innovation/artificial-intelligence/2023/10/31/most-students-outrunning-faculty-ai-use
Council of Writing Program Administrators, National Council of Teachers of English, & National Writing Project. (2011). Framework for success in postsecondary writing. https://wpacouncil.org/aws/cwpa/pt/sd/news_article/242845/_parent/layout_details/false
CUNY Composition Community. (n.d.). Part one: What is felt sense. https://compcomm.commons.gc.cuny.edu/feltsense/part-one-what-is-felt-sense/
David, L., Vassena, E., & Bijleveld, E. (2024). The unpleasantness of thinking: A meta-analytic review of the association between mental effort and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin. Advance online publication. https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/bul-bul0000443.pdf
Digital Education Council. (2024). What students want: Key results from DEC Global AI Student Survey 2024. https://www.digitaleducationcouncil.com/post/what-students-want-key-results-from-dec-global-ai-student-survey-2024
Dobrin, S. I. (2023). AI and writing. Broadview Press.
Doherty, M. (2016, September 4). 10 things you need to know about banyan trees. Under the Banyan. https://underthebanyan.blog/2016/09/04/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-banyan-trees/
Eaton, L. (2025). Syllabi policies for AI generative tools [Google Docs].
Eaton, S. E. (2023). Postplagiarism: Transdisciplinary ethics and integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19, Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00144-1
Ellis, L., & Bindley, K. (2025, July 28). AI is wrecking an already fragile job market for college graduates. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/lifestyle/careers/ai-entry-level-jobs-graduates-b224d624
Emig, J. (1967). On teaching composition: Some hypotheses as definitions. Research in the Teaching of English, 1(2), 127โ135. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED022783.pdf
Emig, J. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders (Research Report No. 13). National Council of Teachers of English.
Emig, J. (1983). The web of meaning: Essays on writing, teaching, learning and thinking. Boynton/Cook Publishers.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365โ387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600
Freeman, J. (2025, February 25). Generative AI and the student experience: Survey findings from over 1,000 UK university students. Higher Education Policy Institute. https://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/HEPI-Kortext-Student-Generative-AI-Survey-2025.pdf
Ghiselin, B. (Ed.). (1985). The creative process: Reflections on the invention in the arts and sciences. University of California Press.
Gimbel, M., Kinder, M., Kendall, J., & Lee, M. (2025, October 1). Evaluating the impact of AI on the labor market: Current state of affairs. The Budget Lab at Yale. https://budgetlab.yale.edu/research/evaluating-impact-ai-labor-market-current-state-affairs
Goldman Sachs Research. (2023, April 5). Generative AI could raise global GDP by 7%. Goldman Sachs. https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/articles/generative-ai-could-raise-global-gdp-by-7-percent
Gotham Ghostwriters, & WOBS LLC. (2025). A.I. and the writing profession: A comprehensive survey & analysis. https://gothamghostwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/AI-Writing-Survey.pdf
Hayes, J. R. (2012). Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 369โ388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451260
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 3โ30). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1986). Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1106โ1113. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1106
Hsu, H. (2025, June 30). What happens after A.I. destroys college writing? The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025/07/07/the-end-of-the-english-paper
Hugo, V. (1831). Notre-Dame de Paris [The Hunchback of Notre-Dame].
Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior: An introduction to behavior theory. Appleton-Century.
Kokotajlo, D., Alexander, S., Larsen, T., Lifland, E., & Dean, R. (2025, April 3). AI 2027. AI Futures Project. https://ai-2027.com/
Kosmyna, N., Heiss, L., Baker, J., Hassman, L., Shapiro, J., & Benjamins, I. (2025). Longitudinal study on AI-assisted writing: Cognitive adaptation and agency in humanโAI co-creation (arXiv preprint No. 2506.08872v1). arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08872
Lee, H.-P., Sarkar, A., Tankelevitch, L., Drosos, I., Rintel, S., Banks, R., & Wilson, N. (2025). The impact of generative AI on critical thinking: Self-reported reductions in cognitive effort and confidence effects from a survey of knowledge workers. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’25), April 26โMay 1, 2025, Yokohama, Japan. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713778
Leijten, M., Van Waes, L., Schriver, K., & Hayes, J. R. (2014). Writing in the workplace: Constructing documents using multiple digital sources. Journal of Writing Research, 5(3), 285โ337. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2014.05.03.3
Lott, M. (2025, April 19). Skyrocketing AI intelligence: ChatGPT’s IQ may now rival humans. Maximum Truth. https://www.maximumtruth.org/p/skyrocketing-ai-intelligence-chatgpts
Lundstrom, K., Babcock, R. D., & McAlister, K. (2023). Collaboration in writing: Examining the role of experience in successful team writing projects. Journal of Writing Research, 15(1), 89โ115. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2023.15.01.05
Mayer, H., Yee, L., Chui, M., & Roberts, R. (2025, January 11). Superagency in the workplace: Empowering people to unlock AI’s full potential at work. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/superagency-in-the-workplace-empowering-people-to-unlock-ais-full-potential-at-work
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
McKinsey & Company. (2023, July 26). Generative AI and the future of work in America. McKinsey Global Institute. https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/our-research/generative-ai-and-the-future-of-work-in-america
Microsoft. (2025a, April 23). 2025: The year the frontier firm is born. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/worklab/work-trend-index/2025-the-year-the-frontier-firm-is-born
Microsoft. (2025b, June 17). Breaking down the infinite workday. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/worklab/work-trend-index/breaking-down-infinite-workday
Microsoft, & LinkedIn. (2024, May 8). 2024 Work Trend Index annual report: AI at work is here. Now comes the hard part. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/worklab/work-trend-index/ai-at-work-is-here-now-comes-the-hard-part
Microsoft, & LinkedIn. (2025). 2025 Work Trend Index annual report: AI at work is here. Now comes the hard part. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/worklab/work-trend-index/ai-at-work-is-here-now-comes-the-hard-part
MLA-CCCC Joint Task Force on Writing and AI. (2024a). Building a culture for generative AI literacy in college language, literature, and writing. https://aiandwriting.hcommons.org
MLA-CCCC Joint Task Force on Writing and AI. (2024b). Generative AI and policy development: Guidance from the MLA-CCCC Task Force. https://aiandwriting.hcommons.org
MLA-CCCC Joint Task Force on Writing and AI. (2024c, March 25). Report on the Critical AI Literacy for Reading, Writing, and Languages Workshop. https://aiandwriting.hcommons.org
Moxley, J. M. (2023a). The embodied writing process: How to tap your creative potential. Writing Commons. https://writingcommons.org/section/writing-process/the-secret-hidden-writing-process/
Moxley, J. M. (2023b). The ultimate blueprint: A research-driven deep dive into the steps of the writing process. Writing Commons. https://writingcommons.org/section/writing-process/writing-process-steps/
Moxley, J. M. (2023c). The writing process: Research on composing. Writing Commons. https://writingcommons.org/section/writing-process/
Moxley, J. M. (2025a, January 13). Universities must compel students to detail how they use AI in assignments. Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/depth/universities-must-compel-students-detail-how-they-use-ai-assignments
Moxley, J. M. (2025b, May 29). Human agency and voice in the shadow of superintelligence [Keynote address]. Teaching & Learning with AI Conference, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL. https://www.canva.com/design/DAGoLzAI2wU/BeaB3D9kTNzgrZldtlDTBA/view
Moxley, J. M. (2025c, July 7). AI challenges higher education to put more emphasis on writing, not less. In Have chatbots killed the student essay? Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/depth/have-chatbots-killed-student-essay
Moxley, J. M. (n.d.). Orality, literacy, and superintelligence: The technologizing of the word. Writing Commons. https://writingcommons.org/section/literacy/orality-literacy-and-superintelligence-the-technologizing-of-the-word/
Murray, D. M. (1972). Teach writing as a process not product. The Leaflet, 11โ14.
Murray, D. M. (1980). Writing as process: How writing finds its own meaning. In T. R. Donovan & B. McClelland (Eds.), Eight approaches to teaching composition (pp. 3โ20). National Council of Teachers of English.
Nam, J. (2023, November 22). 56% of college students have used AI on assignments or exams. BestColleges.
National Association of Colleges and Employers. (2024a). Career readiness competencies (Revised April 2024). https://www.naceweb.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/2024/resources/nace-career-readiness-competencies-revised-apr-2024.pdf
National Association of Colleges and Employers. (2024b, December 9). What are employers looking for when reviewing college students’ resumes? https://www.naceweb.org/talent-acquisition/candidate-selection/what-are-employers-looking-for-when-reviewing-college-students-resumes
National Association of Colleges and Employers. (2025). Job Outlook 2025 (Revised January 2025). https://www.naceweb.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/2025/publication/research-report/2025-nace-job-outlook-jan-2025.pdf
National Endowment for the Humanities. (n.d.). NEH announces new research initiative: Humanities perspectives on artificial intelligence. https://www.neh.gov/news/neh-announces-new-research-initiative-humanities-perspectives-artificial-intelligence
National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13398
North, S. M. (1987). The making of knowledge in composition: Portrait of an emerging field. Boynton/Cook Publishers.
Oliveri, M. E., Lawless, R., & Molloy, H. (2017). A literature review on collaborative problem solving for college and workforce readiness (ETS Research Report No. RR-17-06). Educational Testing Service. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12133
Ong, W. J. (2002). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://monoskop.org/images/d/db/Ong_Walter_J_Orality_and_Literacy_2nd_ed.pdf
Perl, S. (1980). Understanding composing. College Composition and Communication, 31(4), 363โ369.
Perry, S. K. (1996). When time stops: How creative writers experience entry into the flow state [Doctoral dissertation, Saybrook Institute]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/when-time-stops-how-creative-writers-experience/docview/304288035/se-2
Plato. (1999). Phaedrus (B. Jowett, Trans.). In Perseus Digital Library. Tufts University. https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0174%3Atext%3DPhaedrus%3Asection%3D275a (Original work published ca. 370 BCE)
Rainie, L., & Anderson, J. (2024). Experts imagine the impact of artificial intelligence by 2040. Imagining the Digital Future Center. https://imaginingthedigitalfuture.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/AI2040-FINAL-White-Paper-2-2.29.24.pdf
Rohman, D. G., & Wlecke, A. O. (1964). Pre-writing: The construction and application of models for concept formation in writing (Cooperative Research Project No. 2174). Michigan State University.
Rohman, D. G., & Wlecke, A. O. (1975). Pre-writing: The construction and application of models for concept formation in writing (Cooperative Research Project No. 2174). U.S. Office of Education, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
Sano-Franchini, J. (2025, April 10). Timely, (un)disciplinary, and solutions-oriented: Remembering and enacting abundance in these times when we just have to keep going [Conference address transcript]. Conference on College Composition and Communication. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d-LaO7oMoWFBcXgjoyylD0FRqrB1jQZMq9NttPfZOKY/edit
Sano-Franchini, J., McIntyre, M., & Fernandes, M. (2024). Refusing GenAI in writing studies: A quickstart guide. Refusing Generative AI in Writing Studies. https://refusinggenai.wordpress.com
Sommers, N. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication, 31(4), 378โ388. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600
Suchikova, Y., Tsybuliak, N., Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Nazarovets, S. (2025). GAIDeT (Generative AI Delegation Taxonomy): A taxonomy for humans to delegate tasks to generative artificial intelligence in scientific research and publishing. Accountability in Research, 1โ27.
Suleyman, M., & Bhaskar, M. (2023). The coming wave: Technology, power, and the twenty-first century’s greatest dilemma. Crown.
Sun, Y., Sheng, D., Zhou, Z., & Wu, Y. (2024). AI hallucination: Towards a comprehensive classification of distorted information in artificial intelligence-generated content. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1โ14.
Tomlinson, K., Jaffe, S., Wang, W., Counts, S., & Suri, S. (2025, July 22). Working with AI: Measuring the occupational implications of generative AI. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07935
Uttl, B., Violo, V., & Gibson, L. (2024). Meta-analysis: On average, undergraduate students’ intelligence is merely average. ScienceOpen Research. https://doi.org/10.14293/PR2199.000694.v1
Vee, A. (2023). Large language models write answers. Composition Studies, 51(1), 176โ181.
Wang, H., Dang, A., Wu, Z., & Mac, S. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: Seeing ChatGPT through universities’ policies, resources, and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, Article 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100326
Ward, B., Bhati, D., Neha, F., & Guercio, A. (2024). Analyzing the impact of AI tools on student study habits and academic performance (arXiv preprint No. 2412.02166). arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.02166
Watson, C. E., & Rainie, L. (2025, January). Leading through disruption: Higher education executives assess AI’s impacts on teaching and learning. American Association of Colleges and Universities & Elon University’s Imagining the Digital Future Center. https://www.aacu.org/research/leading-through-disruption
Yeo, M. A. (2023). Academic integrity in the age of artificial intelligence (AI) authoring apps. TESOL Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.716
Young, R. (1978). Paradigms and problems: Needed research in rhetorical invention. In Research on composing: Points of departure. National Council of Teachers of English.
