Research Methodology - Photo of Einstein and other physicists “From the October 1927 Fifth Solvay International Conference of Electrons and Photons” by iharsten in licensed under CC0 1.0
Research Methodology is
- the philosophical framework, the epistemology that informs a research project.
- an academic topic of study that explores the philosophy of research methods.
- Methodologists engage in scholarly conversations regarding the epistemological assumptions that inform qualitative, quantitative, mixed, and textual research methods.
- Methodologists are critical about how data is collected, measured, interpreted and used to contribute to knowledge or make a knowledge claim.
- a section or chapter in a study that explains the rationale for the methods the researcher(s) employed to conduct a study.
Key Words: Epistemology; Philosophy of Knowledge; Ways of Knowing
The topic of research methodologies is steeped in philosophy, epistemology, and ethics.
Here’s the rub: researchers may use the same methods to investigate a research question and yet disagree with one another about the kind of knowledge the method produces. For instance, researchers could interview the same subjects and even ask the same questions, maybe even get the same answers, and yet have entirely different ideas about what the results mean. For the researcher contributing to a methodological community that favors positivism, the researcher may assume the interview reveals universal insights about human behavior that transcend time and place. In contrast, a researcher with more of a post-positivistic, subjectivist position might suggest the results are not generalizable, that the results are nothing more than one person’s point of view.
Thus, a research methodology, like language or a knowledge claim, is a rhetorical construct. Research methods are produced in a context: political, economic, social, and historic interests shape what is and what is not considered to be an ethical, reliable, valid method. Even investigators within a methodological community may disagree with one another about how to use methods or what knowledge methods can produce.
Methodologists (i.e., people who theorize about research methodologies) debate epistemological assumptions about
- what is knowledge?
- what is a valid knowledge claim?
- what constitutes a valid research method?
- what are the affordances and constraints of Empirical Research, Textual Research, Informal Research Methods?
- what epistemological assumptions are associated with particular research methods?
- is quantitative research invariably positivistic?
- is qualitative research invariably postpositivistic?
- are mixed research methods given their contrasting epistemological assumptions about valid knowledge claims invariably contradictory and inconsistent?
Research Methods vs. Research Methodologies
| Research Methods | tools, statistical methods, techniques, protocols |
| Research Methodology | epistemological assumptions about what constitutes knowledge and the affordances and constraints of specific methods |
| Clarification: Research Methodology vs. Research Methods Researchers distinguish between methodologies and methods: (1) Research Methodologies are the justification a researcher provides for using particular methods. A researcher’s methodology is the rationale for using particular tools/methods. It is the philosophical framework, the epistemology that informs a research project. (2) Research Methods are the tools and techniques (aka protocols, processes, strategies) that investigators and methodological communities use to gather and analyze information (aka data or evidence). Examples: Case Study | Ethnography In other words, methods can be compared to screwdrivers, hammers, nails, etc. while methodologies can be compared to the architectural plans for a building. |