Unity, Flow, Coherence are stylistic terms used by people to describe a how well a rhetor develops a single topic and relates elements of discourse within a text (e.g., sentences or paragraphs) to other elements of discourse within the same text (i.e., other sentences or paragraphs) and the topic.
A writer who flips from topic to topic or fails to relate ideas to other ideas in a text is said to have weak unity (or underdeveloped thesis/research question and weak substance), incoherent language, and little to no logical flow.
When people read or listen to others, they expect the various elements of a rhetor’s discourse (e.g., genre, rhetorical appeals and options, sections, paragraphs, and sentence) to relate to one another as well as the rhetor’s purpose, thesis, and research question.
A text may be called unified
- when a rhetor maintains the focus to a specific topic throughout the text, no matter how long the text is;
- when the rhetor only introduces substantive evidence that relates to the thesis, purpose, research question;
- when the rhetor stays on the same topic rather than flipping from topic to topic, helter skelter.
A text may be described as coherent
- when the rhetor employs organizational schema that enable a reader or listener to discern how words, clauses, sentences, and paragraphs relate to one another and the overall topic.
A text may be said to have flow
- when it is unified and coherent.
- unity is used to describe a text’s organizational schema from a global perspective
- coherence is used to discern a text’s organizational schema from a local perspective.
- flow is used to assess either univity or coherence, either global or local perspectives.
How can writers create coherence, unity, and flow?
- Between words, rhetors use parallel grammatical structures.
- For instance, writers my employ a verb, noun, or prepositional series.
- Between sentences, paragraphs, and sections, rhetors use transitional devices that highlight the logical connections between ideas.
- Transitional devices include
- repetition of words at the beginning of a sentence that were used in the previous sentence
- metalanguage–i.e, transitional language that explain relationships between ideas or words
- Transitional devices include
- At the global level, rhetors use genre conventions, modes of discourse, common methods for developing paragraphs. organizational patterns.
Metalanguage refers to language that helps writers explain relationships between ideas or words that explain how texts are presented. Use metalanguage to help your readers understand your organization and reasoning. Clarify logical relationships, temporal relationships, and spatial relationships by using metalanguage.
Phrases like “for example,” “as a result,” and “therefore” are examples of metalanguage. Like an impatient TV watcher clicking through hundreds of channels, readers tend to be impatient, always ready to put their work aside.
As a result, throughout a document, you must ensure that readers will understand how different ideas relate to one another. You don’t want your readers to ask
- “So what?”
- “Who cares?”
- “Jeez, just what is this text about?”
- “What’s going on in the world today?” i.e., tangential thoughts.
Successful writers attempt to be sensitive to their readers’ likely responses to their documents. Just as writers commonly summarize their message in their introductions, highlighting its significance, writers frequently repeat their main ideas throughout a document, reminding readers of what’s been discussed, what will follow, and how new information relates to old information. Your essay shouldn’t be a spinning top, wandering from one topic to another–not if you want readers (or a good grade), anyway. Of course, peppering your language with metadiscourse–such as “thus,” “therefore,” “consequently,” and so on–will not provide logic. By itself, metalanguage cannot provide missing logic; it merely provides the glue to help readers better understand how ideas cohere.
Below is a list of common metalanguage terms. Ideally, your ideas relate so well that you do not need extensive metalanguage.
|TRANSITIONAL CUES||COMMON TRANSITIONS|
|To guide readers||You might first conclude|
Please consider the possibility that
As you recallConsider now
|To order ideas and structure texts||To begin…next…furthermore|
First, second, third…
|To place emphasis||More importantly|
|To provide examples||For example|
For instanceIn fact
In other words
|To show logical connections||If…then|
As a result
On the other hand…
We may conclude
It may seem
|To summarize||In conclusion…|
As a result
As I have demonstrated