Mindset, most broadly, is
- a mental framework, a habitual way of thinking and feeling about something that informs how someone perceives, interprets, researches, develops, and tests information and knowledge claims.
- the study of habits of mind (e.g., curiosity, openness, engagement, creativity, persistence, responsibility, flexibility and metacognition and self-regulation) in relation to Composing, Courses, Genre, Information Literacy, Mindset, Research, Rhetoric, and Style
Key Words: Intrapersonal Competency, Soft Skills, People Skills, Disposition, Grit, Mental Toughness, Effort, Professionalism
The mind is everything. What you think, you become.Buddha
Mindsets are ways of perceiving and acting in the world. The mindsets we hold, consciously or subconsciously, shape
- how we feel, think, and act
- our sense of identity and belonging
- what we believe is possible.
A writer or speaker’s mindset plays a powerful role in their success or failure. People with a growth mindset, for instance, are more likely than people with a fixed mindset to respond positively to tough critiques and to challenges, more generally.
We develop mindsets as we encounter other people, experiences, events, issues, and objects. We may mimic the mindsets of others. We may join discourse communities that ascribe to particular mindsets and narratives. From informal research and formal research, empirical observation, and reading, we develop representations of how the world works. Over time, we associate feelings and behaviors with recurring rhetorical situations, and, accordingly we adopt, draft, and revise personas, rhetorical stances, and arguments.
As a rhetor — a speaker or a writer — you invariably develop habitual ways of interpreting and responding to new rhetorical situations based on your past experiences. In part, our personalities, our identities, are defined by the mindsets we hold. Our character–our sense of self–is defined by the mindsets we hold true and dear to our hearts. Likewise, sometimes we describe our friends and work colleagues based on the mindsets they espouse. For instance, when a friend launches an entrepreneurial venture, we might say “Wow, Yolanda has such a business mindset.” Or when someone is afraid to travel, go on a roller coaster, or be adventurous, we might say, “Ah, Tony’s afraid of his own shadow.” And then there’s always Eeyore: “He’s just so damned negative!”
In some ways mindsets function like genres. After all, genres, like mindsets, are prepackaged responses to re-occurring rhetorical situations. When we are communicating via a well known genre, we don’t have to think as much about how to develop, organize or present our ideas. Likewise, for example, if we ascribe to the political mindset of a Republican, a Democrat, or an Independent, we know the positions of those political parties, and we might rely on those pre-packaged responses to global issues like abortion, gun control, or climate change.
Mindset & Success in Postsecondary Writing
Ultimately, the quality of your texts and your apprenticeship as a writer isn’t your teacher’s responsibility, your school’s responsibility or even the responsibility of your employer. Your mindset drives the writing process. No one–a boss or a teacher or a parent–can force you to achieve your potential as a writer. Well, sure, someone can sit by your chair and whip you every time you try to walk away. But punishments (or, better yet, extrinsic rewards) can only go so far. At a certain point, you (the writer) must assume ownership over your own development.
According to the Council of Writing Program Administrators, the National Council of Teachers of English, and the National Writing Project (2011), curiosity, openness, engagement, creativity, persistence, responsibility, flexibility and metacognition and self-regulation are habits of mind that are “essential for success in college writing”:
|Curiosity||the desire to know more about the world
[see Invention|Research|Growth Mindset]
|Openness||the willingness to consider new ways of being and thinking in the world
[see Intellectual Openness]
|Engagement||a sense of investment and involvement in learning
[see Metacognition & Self-Regulation]
|Creativity||the ability to use novel approaches for generating, investigating, and representing ideas
[see Composing Processes | Invention|Research]
|Persistence||the ability to sustain interest in and attention to short- and long-term projects
|Responsibility||the ability to take ownership of one’s actions and understand the consequences of those actions for oneself and others
[see Professionalism & Work Ethic]
|Flexibility||the ability to adapt to situations, expectations, or demands
|Metacognition||the ability to reflect on one’s own thinking as well as on the individual and cultural processes used to structure knowledge.
Your mindset, your attitude and psyche, influences how you communicate. You can best meet your potential as a communicator by
- adopting a Growth Mindset as opposed to a Fixed Mindset;
- being open to new ways of composing, collaborating, and working with critique (see Intellectual Openness);
- thinking metacognitively about ways to improve their research, collaboration, writing, and feedback strategies;
- adopting the Work Ethic associated with Professionalism in the workplace;
- being Resilient when faced with difficult writing projects, teams, and deadlines;
- engaging in Self-Regulation;
- engaging in Self-Critique.
Mindset, Consciousness & Confirmation Bias
People may be consciously aware of some of the mindsets that guide how they interpret and evaluate the behaviors of other people, events, and issues. For instance, someone may recognize they have a social mindset–that they enjoy meeting new friends and exploring new communities. Or, perhaps someone recognizes they are a bit cheap when it comes to spending money–that is, they have
Sometimes being unconscious of one’s mindset(s) is fine or even helpful, especially when the mindset leads to healthy decisions and good outcomes. For instance, consider how someone with a healthy-lifestyle mindset avoids hitting the dessert table at the buffet table. They may not even notice the chocolate mousse pie or decline it based on habit.
Sometimes, however, not being reflective about one’s mindset can lead to faulty communications.
The problem with Mindsets is that they are working hypotheses, yet sometimes we drink the kool aid and consider them to be substantiated knowledge claims. It’s possible for people to embrace a mindset so strongly that that may overlook contrary evidence. Sometimes, as human beings, we engage in confirmation bias — i.e., we ignore disconfirming evidence and selectively perceive evidence that confirms our mindset or argument. To one degree or another, we all share an urge at times to prove our position. This can lead to close-mindedness, the antithesis to rhetorical reasoning and critical literacy.
As an example of this dynamic, consider how people’s mindset — in this case that the assumption that U.S. Democrats were exaggerating the coronavirus for political purposes — led Fox News journalists to underestimate the significance of the coronavirus when it first emerged in 2020:
Research on Mindset
How the mind works, how people change their minds (persuasion), how people of like-minds cluster together, how people strive for consensus in group situations (group think)–these topics have fascinated researchers across disciplines for generations. Cognitive psychologists, learning theorists, communication researchers, management and leadership specialists have all researched the traits that lead to Mindset.
Researchers have proposed a variety of models to account for how people can break through Mindsets to become more open, growth-orientated, and wiser. The work of Carol S. Dweck, a psychology professor at Stanford, has been particularly transformative. Dweck’s hypothesis is that people’s orientation to learning (whether they hold a Growth Mindset or a Fixed Mindset) predicts their learning and success in school and work contexts more than any other factor.
In Education for Life and Work, a white paper published by the National Academies of Sciences, the National Research Council leveraged past scholarship concerning personality traits to theorize that three of the big five personality traits play a foundational role in Intrapersonal Competencies:
- Intellectual Openness (Openness to Experience)
- Work Ethic (Conscientiousness)
- Positive core self-evaluation (Neuroticism)
The National Research Council (2012) and The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2017) are curious about the correlations between intrapersonal competencies (e.g., grit, perseverance, and self-regulation) and learning, retention in school, and professional success.
Not surprisingly, metacognition, intellectual openness, curiosity, emotional resilience and self-regulation have fascinated scientists, social scientists, and humanists for generations.
- Humanities Research
The “Psyche” of the writer (or “Temperament” or “Character”) has been a popular theme in the humanities. One excellent example of this is the Paris Review, a literary magazine that has been interviewing writers and poets. Since the 1950s, thousands of interviews have been conducted of successful writers. Typically the interviews address the artists’ creative processes and habits of mind.
- Workplace Readiness Research
Behaviors such as “Work Ethic” or the ability to reflect on learning (“Metacognition”) or Self-Regulate behavior to achieve goals are called “Soft Skills” in Adult Education and the Workforce Readiness literature. Sometimes these traits are called “Professionalism.” In its annual survey of the most prized workforce readiness competencies, NACE (National Association of Colleges and Employers) found employers rank Professionalism/Work Ethic as the third most important workforce competency (after Critical Thinking and Collaboration).
- STEM Education Research
The National Research Council (NRC) refers to these traits as 21st Century Competencies: “Intrapersonal competencies involve self-management and the ability to regulate one’s behavior and emotions to reach goals” (2012).
- Developmental Psychology & Learning Theorists
Since the 1960s, cognitive psychologists have working to identify traits that define personality. Over the years, they have identified five traits that predict why some people succeed or continue trying in the face obstacles while others give up. Three of the these traits play a foundational role in the Mindset literature:
- Openness to Experience (inventive/curious vs. consistent/cautious)
- Conscientiousness (efficient/organized vs. easy-going/careless)
- Neuroticism (sensitive/nervous vs. secure/confident).
- Learning Theorists
Angela Duckworth, a psychologist at the University of Pennsylvania and recipient of the MacArthur Genius Award, has developed a scale to measure “Grit” and associated this trait as a predictor of success. Grit is most similar to Conscientiousness (efficient/organized vs. easy-going/careless). Duckworth’s research determined that Grit was a better measure of success than IQ.
In the context of empirical research in the field of Writing Studies, intrapersonal competencies have been undertheorized. In the early 1980s George H. Jensen and John K. DiTiberio’s used empirical and formalist methods in conjunction with Jung’s personality construct as a theoretical frame to research composing behaviors. Yet that scholarly conversation withered on the vine as the field of Writing Studies was preoccupied in the 1980s and 90s with post-process, postmodernism, cultural theory, literacy theory, and multimodal composition. One notable exception outside the field of Writing Studies, was Robert Boice, a cognitive psychologist who conducted empirical research on the benefits of daily writing.
However, from the context of personal anecdote, teacher research, case study, or qualitative research, Writing Studies has long been interested in intrapersonal competencies even if that scholarship was not officially subsumed under the umbrella of that term. Historically, different Communities of Practice (Fiction Writers, Teacher-Researchers,, and Expressivists have been curious about the habits, attitudes, and strategies of successful writers. For example, based on his experience as a graduate student, Peter Elbow wrote eloquently about his personal discovery of the power of freewriting. Sondra Pearl explored ways writers work with “felt sense”–an inchoate, prelinguistic feeling about what one was trying to say. Some qualitative researchers have followed small groups of students throughout their college courses , e.g. Carroll, 2002; Beaufort, 2007; Ebest 2005; Wardle, 2009; Fraiberg, 2010; Nowacek, 2011; Driscoll & Wells, 2012; Wardle & Roozen, 2012). And recently there has been a great deal of interest in using interviews, surveys, and observations of writers and their texts to better understand the role of self-regulation and self efficacy on writing and the transfer of learning.