- how a text is composed as opposed to what the text means.
- In other words, style is the shape of content (Shahn 1992)
- a language, a semiotic system
- People read styles just as they read books or webpages: Styles are a way of expressing Clothes ascribe loyalty to a community and set of conventions. For instance, people may infer from your dress your personality, feelings, social status, and community memberships.
- the particular linguistic choices a writer, company, corporation uses in its communications.
Style refers to the way that something is written.
Style is more than writing grammatically correct sentences; it’s about crafting sentences that snag the reader’s attention and refuse to let go, sentences that insist on being savored, sentences that make the writing a pleasure to enjoy. Often, inexperienced writers might believe that adopting an appropriate academic style or a professional/technical writing style is something beyond their skills, something reserved for professionals who have honed their craft over the years or those blessed with inherent talents. This is not true. While creating sentences that make readers weep at the beauty may be reserved for poets and subject matter experts in advertising and marketing, the average writer can create sentences that do more than simply convey information.
All communicative acts are imbued with style. Even the bot that answers the phone when you call in to question your Verizon Communications bill has a style—i.e., the voice of a calm, helpful person eager to help.
- shaped by the medium, media of the text and by the evolution of communication technologies
- Different media, genres of writing, rhetorical situations, and discourse communities invoke different writing styles. For instance, you are likely to use different ways of expressing yourself when on social media (e.g., Twitter, Instagram, Facebook) than when you’re talking with a loved one or family member)
- shaped by the rhetor’s rhetorical situation, especially the discourse communities the rhetor is addressing.
- Style is a rhetorical construct. How styles are defined, valued, and used by discourse communities is largely determined by community conventions, which are disseminated in the textual productions of community members, including style guidelines, peer-reviewed publications, magazines and books, blogs, etc.
- shaped by the writer’s literacy history
- As an individual, over time, you develop a style that is uniquely yours. People learn to speak at certain tones and certain cadences from their childhood experiences, parents and siblings. Later, in school, as we read more about cultures, other people and their experiences, so long as we are open, we are exposed to new ways of expressing themselves. Over time, we pick and choose from our experiences. Most of this happens outside of our consciousness. It is a form of Tacit Knowledge.
Style is a marker of identity and community. Rejection or adoption of a style impinges on how the audience responds to a text. Much of schooling involves mastering the discourse conventions, the genres, of particular communities of practice.
For writers, speaker, knowledge workers . . . style is a dance between following rules and breaking rules. For instance, writers such as Virginia Woolf, James Joyce, Toni Morrison, and TS Eliot are well known for stream of consciousness writing, which overlooks standard written English to set a unique tone and voice.
She had a perpetual sense, as she watched the taxi cabs, of being out, out, far out to sea and alone; she always had the feeling that it was very, very dangerous to live even one day. Not that she thought herself clever, or much out of the ordinary. How she had got through life on the few twigs of knowledge Fraulein Daniels gave them she could not think. She knew nothing; no language, no history; she scarcely read a book now, except memoirs in bed; and yet to her it was absolutely absorbing; all this; the cabs passing; and she would not say of Peter, she would not say of herself, I am this, I am that.Virginia Woolf, Mrs. Dalloway
During deliberations on a legal matter, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart once remarked “I know it when I see it” to indicate what does and doesn’t constitute obscenity (Lattman 2007). When discussing your own prose style, your own unique way of communicating, your unique voice, you’ll know it when you see it.
Style from a Global Perspective vs. a Local Perspective
When discussing your style or the style of someone else, you may find it helpful to distinguish stylistic moves at the global vs. the local level. Style is a composite of multiple language practices that are forged at both
|Global Perspective||Local Perspective|
|A rhetor’s style is shaped by the absence and presence of specific rhetorical appeals, rhetorical devices, and rhetorical modes. The balance of logos to ethos and pathos impinges on style.|
The rhetorical stance a rhetor adopts via persona, tone, and voice largely defines how audiences talk about the rhetor’s style.
When rhetors engage in the processes of scholarship (e.g., they develop substantive discourse that substantiates knowledge claims according to information literacy conventions) they project a learned, professional style.
When rhetors employ genre conventions, their prose identifies them as members of a discourse community.
A rhetor seems smart and focused when they maintain control of the purpose, thesis, research question and maintains a coherent, logical flow.
|A rhetor invokes a professional style by using concrete & sensory language, |
figurative language and concise language.
A rhetor invoke a sense of competence and commitment by avoiding errors of diction, grammar, mechanics, punctuation, sentences.
Style & Subjectivity
How an audience interprets style is a subjective process: readers of books, movie goers, art critics may disagree with one another about how to define a text’s style. And the judgment of critics may vary over time.
People do not always agree about how to define a rhetors’ style or whether a particularly rhetor’s style is appropriate for a given rhetorical context. For example, sometimes writers assume their voice, tone, and persona is appropriate for a rhetorical context, yet—because of the passage of time, cultural differences, personality differences, and so on—readers may find the voice, tone, and persona to be offensive or inappropriate.
|Writers may believe they have written a text as concisely as possible.||Yet the audience may perceive their text to be verbose.|
|Writers may believe they have accomplished their intended rhetorical stance. For example, they may endeavor to employ the critical literacy practices of a judge, arbitrator, or mediator in a litigation dispute).||Yet the audience may find writer’s stance to be overly emotional, or vague/underdeveloped.|
Style & Historical Processes
Styles evolve in response to cultural, technological, and historical changes. In the early days, before the Internet, typewriters, back when you had a find a good piece of bark to scribble your thoughts on, style was different from what it is now. The long sentences and page-long paragraphs of the 19th century have given way to short sentences & paragraphs, embedded hyperlinks and videos, and an increasing reliance on visual language.
Style & Writing Development
In linguistics, cognitive psychology, and literature on writing processes (aka composition), style is studied from a developmental perspective. Primer-type sentences; vague language, generalizations and editing problems are interpreted as evidence of simplistic and dualistic thinking.
[ Writing Studies ]
Style & Creativity
In Interviews of writers @ work, writers often equate learning to write with finding their unique voice. This is especially true in genres that prize creativity and literary language.
[ Composition ]
Style & the Writing Process
In order to employ a style appropriate for a particular rhetorical context, you need to
- identify the register.
- find out if you need to follow any particular style sheet, templates, or citation style.
- Companies often invest significantly in branding, and that branding includes guidelines for templates, logos, and images.
- eliminate archaisms, biased language, clichés, jargon
- question whether your audience will find your language to be vague and underdeveloped. critically evaluate whether or not you have, when possible, used concrete & sensory language as opposed to vague language, generalizations
- proofread for homonyms
- be aware of the connotations of your words and Idioms
- take a hard look at your figurative language.
- Metaphor, Personification, Simile—these are powerful tools. These tools can energize your readers to take action. People can comprehend you best when they can vi and to better understand complex concepts. Yet these tools are rooted in discourse communities and the personal when it comes to crafting your style.
- Style and design are interrelated concepts in the sense that how you work with design elements, design principles, and design tools to innovate, solve problems, and communicate impinges on the style of your written discourse. The main distinction between Style and design is that Style addresses the aesthetics of alphabetical language whereas design addresses the aesthetics of visual language. When working on Style, it’s important to keep an eye on Design.
- Style, voice, tone, and persona are all interrelated concepts. When revising and editing, it’s always wise to consider the appropriateness of these rhetorical elements in relation to your context.